What's
to all of these claims linking Middle Eastern men to Timothy McVeigh and the
1995 Oklahoma City bombing? I've been a newspaper writer more than 20 years
and find the possible connection compelling, even if the federal government
hasn't caught on yet. Have I lost it? Am I sun-stroked?
Absolutely not, say people from Indiana and across the country. Here's a
sample of some of the comments sent to me responding to recent columns on
the subject.
"I
too have harbored a gut feeling or suspicion that McVeigh was a dupe or
pawn, either knowingly or unknowingly in a larger plot," Gregg Black wrote
on Sept. 23. "He went to his grave not revealing a lot of what he knew. So
many questions left unanswered and it could possibly have a link with the
latest atrocities we have seen or may experience ourselves."
Tom Hallett of Monrovia was perturbed that the "mainstream" press has
ignored the evidence. "I really enjoyed your piece of Sept. 22" ("Author
links Iraqi to Oklahoma bombing"), he said. "We haven't heard much about
Oklahoma City for a long time. As you say, there is much evidence that Tim
McVeigh didn't act alone and that there was a foreign angle."
Virginia Jones of Indianapolis chimed in, "I e-mailed your article to
William Safire of the New York Times . He also has an article on the
connection of Iraq to terrorism. Sounds like a cover-up to me, something
that Reno and Clinton didn't want to face."
Elbert L. Watson added, "It has never made sense to me that a young hothead
like McVeigh could have pulled off that dastardly act all alone. Thanks
again for handling a timely topic that helps us think for a change."
Mike Ruggiero of Indianapolis wrote, "I am in awe over the last two
articles you have written on the Sept. 11 event. You have a great handle on
this and are giving people information they cannot get anywhere else."
Bunny Chambers of Oklahoma City: "Thanks again for 'The impeachment lawyer
smells a rat' story" (Oct. 13). Hopefully, someone will listen, and more
terrorist acts will be prevented! Most Oklahomans believe many others were
involved with McVeigh."
Miami
lawyer Jack Thompson: "If you recall, former Attorney General Jane Reno's
boss, President Clinton, blamed the bombing in Oklahoma City on 'right-wing
talk radio hosts.' Any evidence that there was a Middle Eastern terrorist
involvement would imperil that political agenda, wouldn't it?"
Butch Vanetta of Indianapolis: "Are there any reasons given to (former
impeachment lead attorney David) Schippers as to why he is not being
listened to on this? Why are you seemingly the only one I know who is
following this? I appreciate your articles, and keep hammering this."
On
Nov. 26, Harold Piggott wrote, "I visited my daughter in Indianapolis
several weeks ago and read your commentary about the former FBI Agent, Dan
Vogel. I do not understand why they will not let Mr. Vogel testify that he
had received affidavits from people in Oklahoma that they saw Timothy
McVeigh with other men in the weeks leading up to the Oklahoma City bombing.
It makes a person wonder what they are trying to hide."
That is what readers say, but what does the FBI say? What does the bureau
say about the 22 affidavits and more than 30 witness' statements former TV
reporter Jayna Davis turned over to Vogel that Vogel never saw again,
according to court records?
"Nothing,"
Special Agent Danny Defenbaugh of Dallas, who headed up the Oklahoma bombing
investigation, said Thursday. "I've been told that I can't talk about this
until the Justice Department finishes reviewing what happened to the 3,000
documents that resurfaced just before McVeigh's scheduled execution."
Mum's
the word, huh? What about the latest bombshell from Davis that one of the
affidavit authors recognized terrorist suspect Khalid Shaikh Mohammed as
someone who was in Oklahoma City before it was bombed? Mohammed is among the
22 fugitives on the FBI's Most Wanted List President Bush announced Oct. 10.
"Sure, if she has any
information on the current (World Trade Center) investigation, we would want
that," Oklahoma FBI Agent Gary Johnson said Thursday. We shall see.