|
|
Full Coverage
|
|
In-depth coverage about
Oklahoma City Bombing
|
|
Related News Stories
|
| · |
Warnings Cited Before Oklahoma Bombing - Associated
Press (Jun 20, 2002) |
| · |
United by grief - San Francisco Chronicle (Apr 20,
2002) |
| · |
Communities joined in aftermath of loss - Oklahoman
(Apr 19, 2002) |
|
More... |
|
Opinion & Editorials
|
| · |
Terry Nichols's Filipino Connection - Village Voice
(Mar 27, 2002) |
| · |
Right-to-Work Measure Passes in Oklahoma - Concerned
Women for America (Sep 26, 2001) |
| · |
Okeene to Manhattan: a legacy - Oklahoman (Sep 16,
2001) |
|
More... |
|
Feature Articles
|
| · |
Communities joined in aftermath of loss - Oklahoman
(Apr 19, 2002) |
| · |
Key Report on OKC Bombing - The New American (Jul
11, 2001) |
|
Related Web Sites
|
| · |
Timoth McVeigh Death Certificate - fascimile of the
document filed with the Vigo County, Indiana health
department. From the Smoking Gun. |
| · |
Oklahoma City National Memorial - official site of
the memorial museum located in Oklahoma City dedicated
to remembering the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing. |
| · |
After Oklahoma City - features interviews, analysis,
and related news about the bombing, McVeigh's trial and
conviction, and execution proceedings. From PBS' Online
NewsHour. |
|
More... |
|
|
Thirty years
since one of the Supreme Court’s most important decisions,
controversy over legalized abortion continues. But at least it has
moved from in front of Oklahoma’s clinics, women’s health
services officials said.
In the Jan.
22, 1973, decision of Roe v. Wade, the high court of the land wiped
out the confusing hodgepodge of state laws involving abortion and
made the medical procedure something that every woman could legally
obtain. The justices voted 7-2 that abortion was a private matter
and, as such, a constitutionally protected right. Women would not
need to seek out back-alley doctors because they no longer faced the
threat of imprisonment.
But law does
not always perfectly match what individuals want. And since the
issue entered public discourse, those opposing Roe v. Wade’s final
outcome, calling themselves “pro-life,” have clashed with those
supporting the decision, the “pro-choice” side. Arguments have
been waged in court and in front of abortion clinics. Sometimes the
fight has injured people on both sides, emotionally and physically.
Linda Meek,
executive administrator for Reproductive Services in Tulsa,
remembers protesters, “and lots of them,” when she began working
at the women’s health care clinic just 13 years ago.
“They
would lie down outside the door to block access to the clinic, or
put glue in the locks, or yell at the patients with loudspeaker
systems,” she said. Car tag numbers of patients and employees
would be noted so that abortion protesters could track them to their
homes, “telling neighbors how horrible we were, calling us
murderers in our own communities,” Meek said.
“I don’t
want to make someone think that we’ve had it too easy and
encourage them to come attack us again, but I think we’ve been
very lucky in the last few years,” she added. In Oklahoma, “we
don’t have to put up with some of the harassment that facilities
in other states have had to put up with. ... I knock on wood and
count our blessings for that.”
Anita Fream,
chief executive officer of Planned Parenthood of Central Oklahoma,
agreed: “I think the dialogue is a little quieter here and more
civil than in other places in the country.”
Fream said
her agency is planning a retrospective of political cartoons
addressing Roe v. Wade and reproductive choice. The display will be
opened to the public 5:30-7 p.m. Jan. 22 at the First Unitarian
Church, N.W. 13th and Dewey. Wine, soft drinks and snacks will be
available. Tickets cost $20 at the door, and $10 for students.
Fream has
been with Planned Parenthood for about five years. Although the
agency does not provide abortion services, Fream has followed the
development of the law closely.
“I’m old
enough to remember when women had no legal options and to have known
women who were so desperate that they would seek illegal means, and
then pay health consequences for it,” Fream said.
“I’ve
seen women struggle on whether to give a baby up for adoption or to
have an abortion, and it’s not an easy decision. That’s not what
Roe v. Wade changed. … There’s a myth out there that people
would take a decision like this lightly, and I just don’t see
that. … It (Roe v. Wade) was a landmark for women’s health,”
she said.
|